Cancel
Advanced Search
KEYWORDS
CATEGORY
AUTHOR
MONTH

Please click here to take a brief survey

The Week in Sustainable Business (02/06/05)
Gil Friend, 6 Feb 05

Gil Friend is a systems ecologist and business strategist, and is the CEO of Natural Logic, an environmentally-focused strategy, design and management consultancy. He writes a regular blog on issues of business and the environment. Gil has agreed to write occasional essays on sustainable business for our Sustainability Sunday feature, and we are happy to add his voice and perspectives to our site. Take it away, Gil:

This hasn't been the best of times for corporate social responsibility (CSR), and I was thinking that even before those new Enron tapes came out.

The Economist ran a five part piece on CSR a few weeks ago. The first article (linked above, and the only one available to non-subscribers) opens with the provocative line: "The movement for corporate social responsibility has won the battle of ideas. That is a pity..." The author, Economist editor Clive Crook, acknowledges the rise of CSR and the success of the CSR advocates (NGOs, consulting firms, and yours truly alike). He then lays out his concerns, some of them echoing the familiar "the business of business is business," but others rightly challenges the superficiality of much of what passes for CSR:

But what does it all amount to, really? The winners, oddly enough, are disappointed. They are starting to suspect that they have been conned. Civil-society advocates of CSR increasingly accuse firms of merely paying lip-service to the idea of good corporate citizenship. Firms are still mainly interested in making money, they note disapprovingly, whatever the CEO may say in the annual report. When commercial interests and broader social welfare collide, profit comes first. Judge firms and their CSR efforts by what the companies do, charities such as Christian Aid (a CSR pioneer) now insist, not by what they say-and prepare to be unimpressed.

...private enterprise serves the public good only if certain stringent conditions are met. As a result, getting the most out of capitalism requires public intervention of various kinds, and a lot of it: taxes, public spending, regulation in many different areas of business activity. It also requires corporate executives to be accountable-but to the right people and in the right way.

CSR cannot be a substitute for wise policies in these areas. In several little-noticed respects, it is already a hindrance to them. If left unchallenged, it could well become more so. To improve capitalism, you first need to understand it. The thinking behind CSR does not meet that test.

It's a frustrating and occasionally exasperating article for those of us -- both inside and outside these companies -- who support increased corporate social responsibility, but raises some useful questions about the intersection of responsibility and accountability. Moreover, if Crook is correct, and CSR has largely won the war of ideas (in that even the least responsible corporations feel a need to pay lip-service to the notion), this article is a warning that backlash is never far away. CSR advocates should be prepared; the best way to be prepared: deliver durable, measurable -- and profitable -- results.

Other tidbits of the week:

  • The New York Times on "Corporate welfare run amok" (yes, again) in the flap over tax free "repatriation" of overseas profits.
  • Investment website Motley Fool stumbles across renewable energy. Flippant (no surprise there -- it's in the Fool style manual), but an interesting quick read nonetheless. Many more serious experienced sources available too, such as Clean Edge.
  • AlterNet's nominations for the "10 worst corporations of 2004," unsubtly offered as "The year's most egregious price gougers, polluters, union-busters, dictator-coddlers, fraudsters, poisoners, deceivers and general miscreants."
  • As noted here on WorldChanging, the Global 100s nominations for the "100 Most Sustainable Corporations" (maybe) -- a good list, though subtly offered without transparency about the process or precisely how the corporations earned the honor.
  • The Wall Street Journal continued to laud the green building phenomenon.
  • And Business Ethics magazine recently published its 16th annual awards, highlighting some notable progress in, well, business ethics -- and in employee ownership. Kudos to Motley Fool for the article talking about the awards (but not for neglecting to provide Business Ethics' URL!):

    These awards are indeed heartening. But imagine how much more exciting they would be if all the recipients were mammoth corporations doing a lot of good in the world. Imagine Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) winning the General Excellence Award, General Electric (NYSE: GE) winning the Social Legacy Award, and ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) winning the Environmental Progress Award. Hey, it could happen -- and it would mean the world had become a better place in many ways.

    Notably, 29 of the top 100 have made the list five years running -- and that does include some "mammoth corporations."

  • Bookmark and Share


    Comments

    This Economist article was damning much of the sustainability in business movement as wasteful if not pernicious. What is our collective response? Is Adam Smith wrong? Are we mis-interpreting his idea of acting in our own self-interest?

    I believe that the next wave environmental movement is already being driven by consumers, who believe they are acting in their own self-interest, putting their name on waiting lists for wind power and hybrid cars. The future lies not in serving the needs of multiple stakeholders, but in romancing this awakening conscious consumer, and fertilizing (with compost, not DDT) their enthusiasm across the globe. Consumers (primarily American) have driven the economic cycle for the past 20+ years, not monetary policy, not fiscal policy, not even war. Consumers can steer our world to a sustianable alternative until it becomes the only economic choice.


    Posted by: Jen on 6 Feb 05



    EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO:

    YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:


    MESSAGE (optional):


    Search Worldchanging

    Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
    Click here to sign up!


    Worldchanging2.0


    Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/ worldchanging.com
    ©2012
    Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

    Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg