Cancel
Advanced Search
KEYWORDS
CATEGORY
AUTHOR
MONTH

Please click here to take a brief survey

Wired Magazine: The Next Green Revolution
Sarah Rich, 25 Apr 06

FF_140_green1_f.jpg
As we've mentioned several times recently, spring 2006 is arriving amid a sustainability frenzy, heralded by an explosion of media coverage on all things green.

Today marks the online release of Wired's Green issue. We're delighted to the see the words of our own Alex Steffen introduce the conversation, which also includes Al Gore, and a select group of "neo-greens," who've helped push sustainability into mainstream culture and consciousness.

This "Next Green Revolution" - as Alex said on Earth Day - really does need to be regarded and enacted not as a facelifted reiteration of a decades-old movement, but as a series of present-day solutions to present-day problems. That perspective comes through loud and clear in Wired. As we create a more sustainable civilization, we need people to actually understand the systems which make that civilization possible -- techies, engineers, architects, designers, investors and entrepreneurs -- as well as green-minded citizens and consumers. Technology and business aren't the only tools we have to change unsustainable systems, but they are key mechanisms of the movement towards a greener future. It's great to see a 21st Century environmental perspective on the pages of a publication that so heavily influences these fields.

Bookmark and Share


Comments

Flinty Catherine Mulholland, author of the biography of William Mulholland - the water "czar" who brought water to Southern California in the early 20th century - was asked to comment on her famous grandfather's many critics. Her response:

"They take baths don't they?"

Thanks for writing such a great article. There are many great solutions out there that are succumbing to the whiplash of Luddites who "know not what they do." Maybe your article will help them change.


Posted by: C. Scott Miller on 25 Apr 06

The Luddites opposed only technology that 'offends the commonality' - i.e. bad technology. I'm sure they would be in favour of technological solutions, as long as the social and ecological impacts were positive.

That said, I think it is important to keep in mind that technofixes are not always the best solution, even if they are a solution. For example, is a car powered by hydrogen from a processing plant of genetically-engineered algae really better than no car at all? Even these greenest of green technologies do have negative social and ecological impacts. These factors always need to be considered before backing a technology.


Posted by: Chris Anderson on 26 Apr 06

Good design!
[url=http://vvpfoxga.com/jnsj/pffn.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://sbocbojg.com/ilon/qrsg.html]Cool site[/url]


Posted by: Paula on 4 May 06

Good design!
My homepage | Please visit


Posted by: Marla on 4 May 06



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO:

YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:


MESSAGE (optional):


Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Worldchanging2.0


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/ worldchanging.com
©2012
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg