Cancel
Advanced Search
KEYWORDS
CATEGORY
AUTHOR
MONTH

Please click here to take a brief survey

Interview: J.D. Lasica, Ourmedia.org
Micki Krimmel, 7 May 06

jdlasica.JPG.jpg J.D. Lasica is one of the world's leading authorities on citizen media and the personal media revolution. A writer, blogger and consultant, he is the co-founder and executive director of Ourmedia.org and author of Darknet: Hollywood’s War Against the Digital Age.

I recently sat down with him at the OnHollywood conference to discuss the current popularity of user-generated videos online and the movement toward a more open and democratic media system.

Micki Krimmel: J.D., you’re a major hero of citizen media. Why is this so important to you? What potential do you see for it creating real change?

J.D. Lasica: Well, I think almost anybody who’s worked in traditional media as long as I have…I was a newspaper reporter and editor for 20 years…when you see how the sausage factory works, you know that we can do a lot better. I think it’s important for traditional news organizations to go out there and continue covering the world and providing a service to the public. Newspapers and news organizations are a public trust, in that sense. But it’s a different world today and people don’t want to just be talked to or lectured at, they want to be part of a media conversation. And the tools are finally here to let us do that, whether it’s creating our own video or having our own podcasts or just commenting upon the things that we see in the mainstream media in a social network.

I’m going to Seoul this summer to participate in the Citizens Media Conference, put on by Oh My News. South Korea, for some reason, seems to be leagues ahead of the United States in terms of having an online presence and a website where they’re really including tens of thousands of citizen reporters. Citizen media isn’t just about journalism, but I think it’s an important part of what we need to do. People’s distrust in the media is so great right now that they’re looking for alternatives. And if that alternative means that there are a handful of people outside the mainstream media that you can go to for reliable information, for their expertise or judgment on an issue, that’s something anyone in journalism should welcome. It’s important for us all to support the efforts of citizen media organizations because right now, they’re not getting a lot of dollars from the corporate big boys. We have to build this up ourselves. And in some ways, it’s a more noble effort to do something that we think is important for the social good.

MK: You noted in your panel this morning that a few years ago, there were only two video-sharing sites, and now there are 174. What do you make of this user-generated video explosion?

JL: There’s definitely an appetite in the land for users becoming part of a media conversation. I think we’re all tired of the top-down, one-way model of big media, and even the big media companies are starting to realize that they have to change the way they’ve been doing business otherwise people are going to be tuning them out and going to alternative methods of communication. So the rise of the video hosting sites is no surprise; what’s surprising is how fast it’s happened. What a lot of people thought would take years has really taken a matter of months, for better or for worse. My fear is that there is going to be so much noise out there that people are going to walk away. We need to improve the channels so that people can find deeper, more meaningful kinds of stories and videos about people’s lives and their communities and their families, instead of just the latest stupid cat video.

MK: Do you anticipate a trend towards filtering services to help people root through all the content?

JL: Filtering has a negative connotation because people think of big media filters and gatekeepers. But filtering can be useful. If it helps you find the kinds of material that’s interesting or useful to you, then it’s a useful filter. So I think that’s the next big wave coming. In the next year, we’re going to be seeing more and more sites using these social media tools like collaborative filtering, recommendation technologies, friends of friends, trusted peers. And I know people are working on this now - trying to figure out: OK, if I can’t really rely on a million users of YouTube to surface videos that I find interesting, entertaining and useful, who can I rely on? And I think the answer’s going to come down to your friends and your social groups.

MK: What about citizen media for social change? Are you seeing groups forming around social issues?

JL: Yeah. One of the big changes we want to make on OurMedia in the next few months is to make it more of a community-centric site. The world doesn’t need another YouTube. I’m not picking on You Tube, but they’re the ones who are getting all the attention today. There are plenty of sites now where you can just upload your funny video, right? We want to get to a place where more people can feel like they’re doing something - they’re creating video for a social purpose. So, if your passion is all about local politics or the environment or energy or global warming, you should be able to share your thoughts in a text blog or video or podcast.

I would like to see some of these video-sharing sites enable people to go beyond their enclosed walled gardens to connect with each other. And that’s another one of our initiatives – to serve as more of a window into the open media world instead of trying to nudge people into single-destination sites. It sort of contradicts the traditional notion of what you do when you build a website, which is to try to bring people and have them stay. But I think we’re at a stage now on the web where the users are savvy enough to appreciate sites that send them away, and that’s when they’ll come back – when they know that they’re not captive prisoners, but are pointed to something valuable, whether it’s on your servers or somebody else’s.

MK: How do you think Hollywood is adapting to the trends toward openness on the web and participatory media?

JL: Well, Hollywood is always the last to adapt. They’re technology resistant. Whenever there’s a new technology in the marketplace, they resist it. So I think the same natural tendency for them to go slow, to watch what happens, and then to tread cautiously is happening now. They still look at the internet, unfortunately, as a set of pipes for delivery of their content to a passive audience of consumers and as a way to get people into the theaters or to buy a DVD. I get frustrated because there are a lot of really cool independent films that I want to see but there’s no way I could ever order them through pay-per-view or any kind of video-on-demand service – it’s just not there. The technology’s been there for at least ten years. Why are we still having to go to darknet sites to download videos to watch at home? So I think once there’s a mass movement in the marketplace toward more digital distribution, the movie studio heads and executives will finally perk up and start to do something. We’re seeing a few innovations from Disney, of all places. They’re doing some interesting things with set-top boxes and having movies digitally delivered straight to the living room. But everyone else is sort of doing a wait and see approach.

MK: Do you foresee a shift of power away from big media?

JL: I think television executives are waking up to the fact that people are drifting away from the networks, and even cable TV, to create their own media, to share videos, to play games, to engage in other forms of digital media. But they’ve been really slow to embrace any kind of major fundamental shifts – like making their media more interactive and letting people participate in the process. And I think the major movie studios - until they see an impact on the bottom line - they’re not even going to bother.

Some small, innovative production companies are doing socially-significant kinds of films and looking at the internet as sort of an additional or alternative distribution mechanism. And that’s pretty exciting – that they can get their movie out there without the bottleneck of the movie studios.

MK: In my personal work experience, I’m seeing a lot of filmmakers that are very interested in getting online somehow. They see a lot of potential for interacting with moviegoers. They’re not so interested in the typical poster and TV spot marketing campaigns. It’s exciting to see the content-creators pushing for new ways to interact with their audience.

JL: Well, five years ago, it was still unusual to see a DVD with any kind of director’s annotation or commentary, or scenes from the movie that didn’t make it into the final cut. And today, that’s pretty standard. So it’ll be really cool when Hollywood starts looking at the internet not as just a distribution channel, or as an alternative kind of forum for delivery, but also as a way to sort of supplement their works – with campaigns, political action, letter-writing efforts, and all sorts of ways for people to get personally involved in the movie so that when you ship the final movie to the theater, that’s not the end of the process. For example, I think Robert Greenwald has done a superb job of utilizing the web to supplement his work and to eventually involve the audience in creating a social discussion about the issues raised in his movies.

MK: What’s your next big project? Would you like to tell us a little bit about your new open media coalition?

JL: Well, last week a bunch of people who are involved in open media started talking about joining forces in some sense – working together to help make it easier for people to share their personal media, to share their video, their podcasts, etc., across multiple sites and on multiple platforms. And what that means is when you create a video that you’re pretty proud of and want to share, today you have to upload it to the various video-sharing sites one after another. It’s kind of a pain in the neck. And then to ensure people discover it, it’s not a very easy thing. So we’re creating standards and methods of interconnecting open media websites and databases so that somebody sitting at home can just click on a link and have a video pop up on their screen and not really care where the file is actually stored – whether it’s on my servers or somebody else’s. And I think that’s what open media really should be all about. It’s about making your media accessible to a global audience in as easy a way as possible. And the technology’s there now, now we just need the will of the people who are running these sites and who are putting up these devices to make them open enough for us to easily share these creations. And so we’re still at the really early stages of it, but I invite anybody who’s involved in the open media movement to contact us so that we can cooperate in making this work.

Bookmark and Share


Comments

thanks for such an on-point discussion here -very exciting stuff. the development of new apps on cool sites can not be overstated for connecting people in more meaningful ways.

get psyched :)

fb
eagle rock, ca


Posted by: fran battaglia on 8 May 06

The explosion of video sharing sites has not yet led to the inclusion of solid, social networking. Hopefully this is the start of something really worthwhile. Thanks for a great, in depth interview.


Posted by: Danny on 10 May 06

I answered her questions, I just did not volunteer any further information.


Posted by: tenuate on 15 May 06

Secret History featuring yet another media appearance for Bessie and Ted.


Posted by: abilify on 15 May 06

Thank you!
My homepage | Please visit


Posted by: Howard on 18 May 06



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO:

YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:


MESSAGE (optional):


Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Worldchanging2.0


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/ worldchanging.com
©2012
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg