New York City's population topped 8.2 million last year; by 2030 or so it's expected to hit nine million. Where are all these people going to live and work; what's going to power their lights and appliances and elevators? This is the hot topic for Mayor Bloomberg's Sustainability Advisory Board, according to this article by Sam Roberts in The New York Times, buried in this past Sunday's Metro Section (you do read the Metro Section, don't you?).
According to this article, one of the board's big priorities is "how to reclaim as many as 1,700 acres of polluted land — brownfields and other former industrial parcels — and transform them into environmentally sound sites for schools, apartments and parks." Other sustainability questions include:
Two major zoning changes (of the Brooklyn waterfront in Greenpoint and Williamsburg and the Far West Side of Manhattan) foreshadow how the board may recommend addressing these problems, according to The Times; both aimed to reclaim "underutilized" land for economic development and increasing the city's property tax base. Both changes were driven by sustainability board chair and deputy mayor for economic development Dan Doctoroff (as part of the City's failed bid for the 2012 Olympics), a man Mayor Bloomberg says "will have a greater impact on this city, I think, than Robert Moses, in a much more democratic world where there’s a lot more community input and a lot more supervision from the courts and the Legislature."
The Sustainability Advisory Board is expected to release its draft agenda this week, and invite comments from civic groups and the public. (The mayor is expected to present the board's final goals, and strategies to achieve them, by mid-2007.) This document is one to watch out for.
WorldChanging readers are some of the most thoughtful and informed advocates of sustainable development there are. So, what are some of your ideas for transforming New York City into an environmentally sound, economically vibrant, and healthy mega-metropolis over the next 25 years?
If the next 25 years play out as some climatologists predict, you may think of how to turn Manhattan into another Venice.
another real question for NYC is how to achieve all this while providing affordable housing within reasonable commuting distance to the city. The island of Manhattan is long gone as an option for middle income earners, but even the affordable areas in Brooklyn, Queens, and Hudson county NJ get pushed further and further from the city every year.
KR is right. The long term solution is making downtown living convenient and affordable. Unfortunately, for MOST OF US, we are living OUTSIDE of the downtown core in subburbs which force us to use our cars and accelerate global warming and lung diseases such as cancer. Urban living has become an expensive luxury with the following sales pitch reason for paying the premium: convenience (i.e.: close to work, home, food, entertainment and anything else). If cities REALLY wanted to cut down on emissions and encourage people to move into the core and reduce their environmental footprint, they would limit the housing prices, encourage developers to build up and use green environmental planning in cooperation with developers so people have access to all the essentials within walking distance. Until then, driving a gas fueled car, being stuck in traffic and living far from everything is still cheaper than living downtown for almost everyone.