Advanced Search

Please click here to take a brief survey

An Update on OLPC from Dr. Negroponte
Ethan Zuckerman, 1 Jun 07
Article Photo

At tonight’s Harvard Law School cocktail party, before Nicholas Negroponte arrived to give a talk about One Laptop Per Child, a friend asked me why I continue to attend Negroponte’s talks. “Given how many of these you’ve heard, what are you going to get out of this?”

The truth is, I learn something new every time Negroponte talks about the project. Even before he began talking, it was interesting to discover that he’s come equipped with almost a dozen “B2″ prototype machines. They’re open and live on tables around the room, for people to play with - that’s a big improvement from the last time I played with the machine, when the machines were still being hand-built, were in scarce supply and you needed someone to walk you through the Sugar interface.

Negroponte starts by reminding us that OLPC is an education project, not a laptop project. He traces his work on the project to Seymour Papert and to the learning process students go through in learning Logo. Debugging, he argues, is as close as we can get to learning how to think… and it works for skills like spelling, as well as for programming.

Much of the focus of his presentation is on the failure of schools around the world. He makes it clear that the reason for OLPC is for low-income countries where schools may not have buildings or teachers, not just for middle-income countries. He talks about a Nigerian classroom where the XO laptop is being tested - enrollment in the first grade class has doubled, because students came out of the woodwork to get to use the machine.

Students enter schools in first grade with wide, curious eyes, Nicholas tells us. By fourth grade, they’re bored and no longer curious. “We’re inoculating against ignorance.” That’s why the project can’t be incremental - you have to inoculate whole countries, not just a school or a village.

The landscape has changed around the project, as Negroponte acknowledges. He takes a swipe at Intel’s Classmate project, pointing out that the machine has a 65w power supply, while the XO generally draws less than 2 watts. “If Libya gave every student a Classmate, they’d have to build new power plants.” Answering a question about whether the machine will run Windows - it will, and it wouldn’t be open if it didn’t, he argues - he points out that Windows now has a $3 edition, in part in reaction to the OLPC project. “We don’t have to be in the laptop business.” If other projects can put a laptop in every child’s hands, the project achieves its goal, even if the laptop is not the XO.

Despite the enthusiasm of countries like Rwanda, Libya and Uruguay, all of which are entertaining the idea of providing laptops to every schoolchild, no country has yet written a check to the project. That includes Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria, Pakistan, Palestine and Thailand as well, all of whom Negroponte lists as first-stage adopters of the project. It’s a big check to write - nations are being asked to invest in the laptop one million at a time. That’s $176 million for the machines alone, at current pricing, plus money for distribution and Internet provision - the actual price tag could be closer to a $200 - 250 million investment. As the project scales up, the price drops - possibly as low as $100 per unit in 2009, possibly to $50 per unit in the next decade. Quanta, which manufactures the machine, is ready to scale to a million laptops per month by year’s end. That doesn’t sound like much, Negroponte tells us, but global laptop production is only 5 million a month.

(In response to a question about whether laptops will be available in the US, Negroponte gives two answers. One is that there are some early discussions about making the laptop available in US schools. Also, it’s likely that end users will be able to purchase machines in a 1 for the price of 2 deal, where you can buy a machine, but subsidize one for students somewhere in the world. Negroponte makes it clear that OLPC won’t manage this project - they see it as too incremental - but they will allow it to happen and believe it will happen in the next 12 months.)

Negroponte’s talk was fairly light on specs - two major changes that I noticed in his slides. Because of the rising cost of nickel, the machine is now using Lithin ion batteries instead. The decision to use nickel metal hydride was designed to allow batteries to be charged by human power as efficiently as possible - lithium batteries are more difficult to trickle charge.

Dr. Negroponte emailed to correct me: the new generation of machines will not be using Lithium Ion, but Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiPeFo4), a battery technology that is not yet in wide use, but has some characteristics which could be especially appropriate for the XO machine. Specifically, the batteries tend to deliver less heat than Lithium ion and are much more resistant to explosion if misused. It’s unclear whether they are easier to charge using human power than Lithium ion. Dr. Negroponte tells me that OLPC’s partners will be building a factory specifically to produce the LiPeFo4 batteries.

Flash memory costs have come down, however, and the machine currently features a gigabyte of flash RAM.

Negroponte closes with a story about the appearance of the machine, explaining why it’s green and white. The reason was Nigerian President Obasanjo’s enthusiastic embrace of the machine. After a cabinet meeting at Obasanjo’s villa, the President declared, “Professor Negroponte, I have one word for your project: enchanting.” Thrilled by the reception, Negroponte asked for the next prototype to be in the colors of the Nigerian flag - green and white.

It’s an enchanting project, and it’s more realistic every time I look at it. But it’s fair to be skeptical up until the moment a government signs that very big check.

Bookmark and Share


"The landscape has changed around the project, as Negroponte acknowledges. He takes a swipe at Intel’s Classmate project, pointing out that the machine has a 65w power supply, while the XO generally draws less than 2 watts. 'If Libya gave every student a Classmate, they’d have to build new power plants.'”

The wire pull dynamo charger may be the most immediately useful result of the OLPC project. If people can start thinking about battery switching and progressing from handcrank and string pull to bicycles and pedal power on into automobiles and other vehicles.

I had a chance to play with one of the string pull chargers at the recent Affordable Technology conference at MIT.

Posted by: gmoke on 1 Jun 07

Any chance we can get a review of the networking capabilities of these OLPCs? I am hugely curious about how well they actually work with each other - does the mesh networking really enable all laptops to access the internet if one has access? Is the collaboration stuff (where two laptops can work on the same document at the same time) actually useful and/or cool?

I wrote a review of the OLPC after playing with a single machine at the Maker Faire. But because there was only a single machine it was impossible to test all that networking stuff...

Posted by: Eric Boyd on 2 Jun 07

India has not signed on to this project because it said that it could produce the machines for $47 instead of the projected $100. Why doesn't Negroponte make a deal with the Indian government to start production there? Port au Prince, the capital of Haiti, is already largely wified (oh,yes, things are farther along than you thought) so we are all just waiting for this machine. Perhaps we will have to go with the market if the academy is too slow. The poor nations should not have to invest start up capital for this - really --- this is venture capital that he is looking for..... Surely someone of the billionaires has this money.

Posted by: Elizabeth Eames Roebling on 3 Jun 07

Elizabeth, I appreciate the concerns about bringing the laptop to market, but I'd note that the process has actually been incredibly fast so far. The machine is entirely novel, has had to be designed and built from scratch, and in under two years has gone from a couple of sketches to a factory-built prototype. It's very easy for the Indian government to declare they're going to build a machine for $47 - good luck doing that. The Indian government has been promising low-cost laptops since the Simputer project and has found actually delivering the technology can be very difficult to do at appropriate pricepoints.

Posted by: EthanZ on 3 Jun 07

Our technology works us over completely. It changes every aspect of our lives. An injection of technology on this scale is bound to disturb social, political and religous structures that have existed in these societies for a long time. Negroponte and his colleagues at MIT knows this. They are versed in the effects of media. But they have done nothing to research the potential effects of dropping 100 million laptops into the poorest areas of the world. Why?

This project feels like the missionaries of the past, running around the world force feeding english and the bible knowing that it would pry open the doors for other motives.

Posted by: ok on 5 Jun 07

“We’re inoculating against ignorance.” That’s why the project can’t be incremental - you have to inoculate whole countries, not just a school or a village."

Doesn't this sort of statement weird people out a bit? Doesn't it sound like something that would have been used to justify the missionaries?

Is the U.S. really in a position to innoculate the rest of the world against ignorance?

I'm sure other parts of the world look at us and think we are ignorant in a lot of ways. What would happen if another country decided to innoculate the U.S. against their own ignorances?

Posted by: ok on 5 Jun 07

While I am sure there are some effects not fully thought out, the purpose behind Dr. Papert's proposal for one-laptop-per-child was because of the potential benefits of "dropping 100 million laptops into the poorest areas of the world." Papert teaches kids to program, to use the machines as problem solving tools, and to use those problem solving techniques on other problems. This isn't the automation of American big business by any stretch.

Go look at Papert's stuff at the MIT website.

Are there bad effects you can see that you don't think they've considered? Holler about them -- let's get some discussion going.

In the interim, research tends to show that getting kids excited about education works wonders -- and that's the effect these laptops should have.

Good luck to Negroponte and Papert (and may Dr. Papert continue his recovery, but quickly).

Posted by: Ed Darrell on 10 Jun 07



MESSAGE (optional):

Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg