Last month, EPA made its landmark finding: Global warming threatens public health and welfare. Now, as Greenwire (subs. req’d) reports today:
U.S. EPA’s proposed endangerment finding cleared the White House review process yesterday, paving the way for an official announcement detailing the threats posed by global warming to both public health and welfare.
My sources say the official announcement is likely to come next Wednesday, April 22 aka Earth Day. But this endangerment finding is going to benefit humans much more than the Earth, which will certainly be fine no matter what we humans do.
This decision means EPA and team Obama will be able to issue regulations that deal primarily with new facilities that generate substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions — new dirty coal plants, this means you! (see “Obama EPA to act on global warming emissions from new coal plants“). It also will apply pressure on Congress to act.
Here is more on today’s story:
President Obama’s EPA inherited the global warming review following an April 2007 Supreme Court decision that ordered the Bush administration to reconsider whether greenhouse gas emissions are pollutants subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act.
EPA sent its proposed “endangerment finding” on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to the White House last month for review….
EPA spokeswoman Cathy Milbourn today declined to give a timeline for when Jackson is expected to sign the proposal.
The EPA document said the agency does not plan to propose immediate regulations aimed at controlling heat-trapping gases from cars, power plants and major sources of greenhouse gas sources. Instead, the agency is planning to hold back on new rules to synchronize with a final endangerment finding and other environmental policies.
Industry groups have expressed concern that issuing the endangerment finding will trigger an avalanche of costly regulations of even small sources under the Clean Air Act, while agency lawyers and environmental groups insist that new rules would be carefully coordinated.
David Doniger, policy director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s climate center, dismissed industry’s allegations as “scare tactics.”
“The EPA is able to focus on the big stuff, the big sources of global warming pollution, and the two biggest are motor vehicles and power plants, so there’s nothing to the scare stories that didn’t convince the court — the Supreme Court — and shouldn’t convince anyone that this is going to go beyond the big central sources”….
Environmentalists express hope that the regulations triggered by the finding will work in concert with congressional efforts to pass a comprehensive energy and climate change bill.
“Both EPA and congressional action are absolutely essential; they go hand in hand,” said Emily Figdor, Environment America’s federal global warming program director.
Congress should set an overall framework for transitioning to a clean energy economy and stopping global warming, while EPA exerts its existing authority under the Clean Air Act to require cars and power plants to slash their greenhouse gas emissions, she said.
I’m told we also may get an announcement concerning the California waiver that mandates cut in auto CO2 emissions, perhaps even a national standard for new cars.
Stay tuned! Next week should be a big one for climate action.
this post originally appeared on Climate Progress
image courtesy of Labelident
"Motor vehicles and power plants" are not the two biggest polluters. Buildings produce more CO2 than exhaust pipes and industrial farming, especially cows and pigs, produces about as much greenhouse gas as exhaust pipes do.
Hey I came across your page by luck on ask while hunting for something totally irrelevant but I am very glad that I did, You have just captured yourself another subscriber.