Advanced Search

Please click here to take a brief survey

Net Zero Water
Adam Stein, 13 Oct 09

Designing water-neutral homes

Water and climate change are inextricably linked. As the planet warms, weather patterns will shift, exacerbating drought in some areas and delivering more rainfall to others. Water itself requires energy to deliver, so excess use compounds our energy problems. And many renewable sources of power, such as solar, require massive amounts of water as an input, creating further pressure on limited resources.

Net zero water is an analogous concept to net zero energy. Through a combination of rainfall harvesting, aggressive conservation, and water recycling, buildings can achieve self-sufficiency from the water “grid.”

At least in theory. Net zero water is considered the most difficult condition in the Living Building Challenge, an uber-stringent standard for green buildings. Despite a handful of attempts, no buildings have yet achieved LBC certification.

To achieve water independence, buildings divide available sources of water into categories and treat them accordingly. Rainwater is relatively clean, and can be converted into drinking water with a minimum of processing.

Grey water can be cleaned by filtering it through a biological wastewater treatment system such as the Living Machine, a sort of wetlands in a box containing plants, bacteria, plankton, even snails and clams. I’ve seen a similar principle put in place at one of the landfills I visited for TerraPass. Effluent from the landfill was bubbled through a series of plant-filled pools, in which organisms remove contaminants such as organic matter and heavy metals. By the time the water reaches the final pool, it is clean enough to be reintroduced into the watershed.

It’s unclear what role, if any, the net zero water concept will play in future conservation efforts. In the most water-starved parts of the country, homes undoubtedly do not receive enough rainfall to serve their needs. And the most resource-efficient parts of the country – large cities – will always have to import water, because of their sheer density. Nevertheless, water efficiency makes as much sense as energy efficiency, and net zero water provides an admirably ambitious goal.

Article originally appeared on TerraPass.

Bookmark and Share


There is no such thing as zero water, just as zero energy is a fiction. Both concepts are human make-believe, basically.

Posted by: Josh S on 14 Oct 09

Josh S., that's an interesting assertion. Can you elaborate? In both cases, "net-zero" merely means buildings that produce at least as much as they use: of energy for heating, cooling, lighting, etc., or of water for drinking, sewage, etc. Is that impossible, or make-believe? If so, why?

Posted by: David Foley on 15 Oct 09

Post A Comment

Please note that comments will remain open for only 14 days after the article is posted. While previous comments will remain visible, attempts to post new comments after this period will fail. This helps stop comment spam, so your forebearance is appreciated.

The Worldchanging comments are meant to be used for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in our posts. Please note that, while constructive disagreement is fine, insults and abuse are not, and will result in the comment being deleted and a likely ban from commenting. We will also delete at will and without warning comments we believe are designed to disrupt a conversation rather than contribute to it. In short, we'll kill troll posts.

Finally, please note that comments which simply repost copyrighted works or commercial messages will be summarily deleted.

Yes No







MESSAGE (optional):

Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg