Cancel
Advanced Search
KEYWORDS
CATEGORY
AUTHOR
MONTH

Please click here to take a brief survey

New Report Finds 31 States Have The Renewable Resources To Be "Energy Self-Reliant"
Joe Romm, 16 Oct 09


A new report from the New Rules Project finds that over 60% of all U.S. states have the renewable energy resources to be “energy self-reliant.” (“Energy self-reliance,” as defined in the report, is a measure of how self-sufficient in energy generation a state could be if it relied entirely on its own renewable resources). The New Rules Project, a program of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, released its findings last week.

The report, “Energy Self-Reliant States: Second and Expanded Edition” describes how 31 states have the capacity to independently meet their states’ electricity demands by using wholly renewable energy sources, already at their disposal. Several states, the report notes, could use their renewable energy resources to produce electricity that meets over ten times their statewide demands. An additional ten states could generate enough electricity to meet well over half of their annual demands—again, solely from renewable sources.

The report’s analysis and projections only incorporates renewable energy resources that are currently commercially deployable:

These sources include geothermal, onshore and offshore wind, combined heat and power, traditional geothermal, rooftop solar PV, and micro hydro powers. Enhanced geothermal power, for example, is examined in the report yet not included in the final projections because the resource is considered an “immature renewable energy technology” in need of further improvement. With the development of such nascent technologies, an even greater amount of electricity demands could be met from renewable resources, especially in those states listed in the report as not energy self-reliant.

The New Rules Project’s estimates are quite promising. The report is conservative—it excludes various budding energy technologies in reaching its estimates and it does not even anticipate any advances in energy storage or efficiency. Nonetheless, while the data are compelling, the authors of the report hastily conclude that their findings indicate the need for a decentralized renewable energy transmission network. They argue that such a system should be supplanted by state and local networks. This conclusion does not line up.

Rather than local networks, a comprehensive and robust national clean-energy smart grid has the potential to maximize the economics, efficiency, and reliability of a renewable energy system.

First, as seen in the report’s estimates of state-by-state renewable energy production, most of the nation’s renewable energy resources currently lie in more remote areas of the country. Many of the states identified as “energy self-reliant” earn that title because they have both vast renewable resources and lower electricity demands. With a national clean-energy smart grid, we can better harness the enormous renewable energy potential that exists in remote states and transmit that energy to major energy markets.

Second, a national smart grid with reliable and profuse sources of energy can reduce any problems that result from rising grid congestion in regional markets, such as blackouts and subsequent costs. The authors of the study argue for state and local transmission networks, ignoring technical difficulties that could arise. We cannot afford more New York City style blackouts, and we do not need to create that risk.

The report finds that there are many states that have the renewable energy potential to produce enough clean-electricity that exceeds their own demands. This finding only strengthens our need for a national clean-energy smart grid. We should put the full potential of the renewable resource-rich states to work. In doing so, we can create more jobs in those very states by letting them serve the national market through a national transmission network.

Though the authors of the report offer policy recommendations that might not be the most beneficial for a future clean-energy economy, the estimates from which they induce those recommendations indicate that the United States has ample renewable resource potential—one that must be harvested to its fullest capacity.

This article originally appeared on Climate Progress.

Bookmark and Share


Comments

If 60% of all U.S. states could be energy self-reliant, why aren't they utilizing their clean sources of energy? The report shows that most renewable energy sources are cheaper than fossil fuels. By investing in renewables, cities and states are ultimately investing in economic development initiatives and will reap the benefits in the future. The problem often is that governments often look in the short term.

There is no question that the amount of renewable energy in each state is significant (whether it's solar, wind, geothermal, etc.) It is important not only to harness clean energy but to increase our efficiency and aim at reducing consumption. By relying on local sources of renewable energy for our use, local economies will benefit and I believe it will create a greater sense of responsilibity and connect society to their surrounding environment.

Great Article.


Posted by: Michelle on 16 Oct 09

Michelle, you asked the key question: if there's so much potential that's actually CHEAPER than the current energy system, why isn't more being done? Brad Plumer answered that question in an excellent piece in the New Republic here: www.tnr.com/article/drunk-power Long story short, the regulations governing our energy system are backwards, rewarding inefficiency and pollution (seriously).

Disclosure: I'm associated with Recycled Energy Development, the company run by Tom Casten, who's featured in the Plumer article. RED turns manufacturers' waste heat into clean power and steam, cutting greenhouse gas emissions and power costs at the same time. So it might seem like I'm biased here, but the reason I'm involved with RED is the massive potential to make energy in a cleaner, cheaper way. If we change the regulations, such power options would proliferate.

Now,


Posted by: miggs on 17 Oct 09

All are interesting questions, statements and analaysis. Michelle, you are entirely correct in my opinion. We all know (without being biast) the U.S. are fueld by high-levels of consumption to increase economic growth. We also knwo the economic growths disguises other Governmental issues. This is the reason i think the U.S. are not using renenwable eneryg resources to their full capacity. Becuase of selfish, economic needs and demands.

Comment?


Posted by: Sebastien on 8 Apr 10

Post A Comment

Please note that comments will remain open for only 14 days after the article is posted. While previous comments will remain visible, attempts to post new comments after this period will fail. This helps stop comment spam, so your forebearance is appreciated.

The Worldchanging comments are meant to be used for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in our posts. Please note that, while constructive disagreement is fine, insults and abuse are not, and will result in the comment being deleted and a likely ban from commenting. We will also delete at will and without warning comments we believe are designed to disrupt a conversation rather than contribute to it. In short, we'll kill troll posts.

Finally, please note that comments which simply repost copyrighted works or commercial messages will be summarily deleted.

REMEMBER PERSONAL INFO?
Yes No

NAME


EMAIL ADDRESS


URL


COMMENTS



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO:

YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:


MESSAGE (optional):


Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Worldchanging2.0


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/ worldchanging.com
©2012
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg