Advanced Search

Please click here to take a brief survey

Our Bright Green Moment

The Earth's thin precious atmosphere, seen from the International Space Station.

Dear Worldchangers,

As the global debate about climate change heats up, the Worldchanging team is becoming more and more of a go-to source for the solutions you seek. As an ideas workshop, we create content and share the best ideas that we can find from around the world on cutting-edge practices, such as innovation networks, metropolitan coalitions, and government 2.0 solutions. These ideas help you make sense of the world you live in while uncovering the progresses that are building a more vital, sustainable and prosperous planet.

We share these great ideas with you because we think they'll help you make sense of the world around you and inform your thinking about our changing planet. However, this work cannot be done alone: we need your continued support. The work we've done to spread our message globally is a direct result of funding from readers like you. We cannot function without your generous donations, and we are now in need of that gift today.

When you read Worldchanging's daily blog or our weekly newsletter, you know that you can depend on Worldchanging for a regular dose of quality news and inspirational thinking about the sustainability movement. We've also taken our message offline in our first Worldchanging print magazine and in a series of presentations and talks.

Last month, for example, Worldchanging played host to a two-night event at our local Town Hall, where among other things, Alex Steffen called upon Seattle to become the first carbon-neutral city in the United States. His talks were amazingly well received, and are now airing on the Seattle Channel. If you weren't in the audience, you can hear what else Alex had to say by watching the video from the event on the Seattle Channel site.

All these events are a direct result of the kind of work we do here at Worldchanging every day. If this is the kind of work that matters to you, please support us by donating now. We know that the time is now for creating the kind of change we need to create a better future.

Worldchanging continues to be the go-to news source for all people who believe that a better world is already here. That feeling of connectivity is alive and well on the site. Help us continue to build, to create and to widely distribute this kind of thinking. Please click here to donate today.

Image credit: NASA

Bookmark and Share


We attended Alex's talks at Seattle’s Town Hall last week. We were excited to hear someone intelligent who spoke of the need for governmental action now to address climate change. The presentation on Wednesday night was informative and laid out both the challenges and the hopes we face in this situation.
However, we were all disappointed in the talk on Thursday night. It was billed as a talk on how to create a Bright Green future for Seattle. As a group, we felt it was woefully short on direction and details about what we could do to make that future a reality.

We got the message that way fewer cars, way more density, and way more political involvement would be key. But frankly, that is all pretty obvious. Fewer cars will mean fewer carbon emissions. How do you propose we get there? Simply creating wider sidewalk areas and slowing traffic is not enough of an answer. How will we make sure people are able to get where they need to go? Right now there are not even grocery stores in all neighborhoods. Is improving that part of your plan? How should we increase the use of mass transit? What are the short-term incentives for living car-free for those who can’t see the big long-range one: survival? What are the steps we need to take to make fewer cars a reality?
More density is something Seattle has been working toward for a while now with its neighborhood urban village work. We are a long way from this resulting in a reduction in carbon emissions. How much CO2 can we save with this or any of your plans? Don’t we need to find bigger ideas, such as finding a way for people to actually live in the communities they work in?

Here are some specifics:
• Abandon the new 520 Bridge idea and get folks who live in Bellevue (or the eastside) and work in Seattle to “swap” homes with Seattleites who work on the Eastside.
• Abandon the new tunnel (please talk to mayor-elect Mike McGinn), moving vehicles is not the “wave of the future”.
• Build (subsidize) “mother in law” apartments throughout the City to create affordable living space for suburbanites moving to the City.
• Build on the program that linked seniors living in large houses with others who could share their house and create a network/program to promote intentional living/sharing arrangements throughout the city/county. Many Seattle homes are larger than necessary for the number of people who live there.
• Stop crying over Boeing moving to South Carolina; by 2030, George Monbiot suggests we better be flying 90% less or else.

We need specific ideas for the short, medium and longer term in the areas of transportation, the ways people live, public education, increasing the political will to act, etc.

The idea of being more involved citizens in the local political efforts would certainly have good results. As you say, 20 people at a board meeting could change the shape of policies. But again, what are the policies we want to shape or create?

Which gets us to the basics of what we were longing to hear Thursday night. “Seattle creates x amount of CO2 per year right now. Our goal should be to reduce that to y by 2020. To get there we need to take these steps in the first 5 years. That will result in this much reduction. It will set us on a course to be at the y level by 2020. Then we need to ramp up by taking these steps. These steps will get us to zero emissions by 2030.”

I apologize for this being so long. My friends and I were very hopeful about learning HOW to make Seattle Bright Green. The talk left us with more questions than answers.

Posted by: Spencer Beard on 11 Dec 09

Great comment Spencer. I usually hate it when people go to events wanting to be told what to do and then complain that all they heard were problems and motherhood statements, not solid, practical, easily implementable solutions, but then offer none of their own. You have had this experience, and then offered your own solutions.

I encourage you and your friends (and everyone out there), who have been left with so many more questions, to seek more of your own answers.

Posted by: steve on 17 Dec 09

Post A Comment

Please note that comments will remain open for only 14 days after the article is posted. While previous comments will remain visible, attempts to post new comments after this period will fail. This helps stop comment spam, so your forebearance is appreciated.

The Worldchanging comments are meant to be used for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in our posts. Please note that, while constructive disagreement is fine, insults and abuse are not, and will result in the comment being deleted and a likely ban from commenting. We will also delete at will and without warning comments we believe are designed to disrupt a conversation rather than contribute to it. In short, we'll kill troll posts.

Finally, please note that comments which simply repost copyrighted works or commercial messages will be summarily deleted.

Yes No







MESSAGE (optional):

Search Worldchanging

Worldchanging Newsletter Get good news for a change —
Click here to sign up!


Website Design by Eben Design | Logo Design by Egg Hosting | Hosted by Amazon AWS | Problems with the site? Send email to tech /at/
Architecture for Humanity - all rights reserved except where otherwise indicated.

Find_us_on_facebook_badge.gif twitter-logo.jpg